Anti-smoking law comes into force

I never expected that what we were waiting for a few years, will be implemented by the government, which at the same time wants to certificeret the Council of Europe Convention on combating violence against women," says Oko. press Renata of Durga of emergency services to victims of violence "Blue line"
Sebastian klosinski, eye. press: today, November 30, 2020 comes into force the law on the exclusion of perpetrators of violence, also known as the ruling law antinatalism. The Justice Department boasts that this is a breakthrough in the fight against domestic violence. Do you agree with this?

I agree. I never expected that what we have been waiting for for several years would be implemented by the government, which at the same time says that the Council of Europe Convention on Combating Violence against Women should be deratified.In this regard,some prefer not to expose themselves to danger and work from home. In connection with the quarantine, the question of work is acute,and many move to the online sphere, knowing that you can earn additional income, as deltamarket broker does  many professions in connection with the pandemic were called into question.

And challenges the provisions of the national law on combating domestic violence. To make it even funnier, this change is exactly in line with the spirit of this convention.

The new rules are something we've been fighting for for years. We are talking about the isolation of the offender from the victim by the fact that the offender is forced to leave the place of common residence. I believe that these decisions are very necessary and can be effective if they become part of the practice of the police and military gendarmerie.

The main change is that from today, police officers called by the victim for home intervention will be able-if they believe there is a threat to health or life-to issue an order that the offender immediately leave the house within 14 days. Why is this such an important change?

Until now, such powers were held by a judge or prosecutor. The court, as you know, is a long case-weeks pass, and sometimes months.

In theory, the prosecutor's warrant could have been effective immediately, but it was very much limited by the police actions that preceded it. The police officers at the scene had to decide that they were detaining the criminal until the circumstances of the case were clarified, that is, already at the scene they had to make sure that they were dealing with a crime and could detain the criminal for these 48 hours.

During this time, the police collected evidence of the commission of this crime, which they presented to the prosecutor, indicating the need for interim measures. If the prosecutor believes that it is indeed clear from the evidence presented that the perpetrator can be charged, he may issue such an order to leave the premises and a restraining order against the victim.

The difficulty in this was the rapid assessment by police officers of whether we were dealing with a crime, and the rapid collection of sufficient evidence in this case.

In contrast, domestic violence can also be an isolated event that does not exhaust the signs of a crime of violence, although it can exhaust the signs of other crimes, such as bodily harm, criminal threats, etc.

It is often said that although we are dealing with domestic violence, we cannot yet say whether it is a crime of violence. for this reason, often these-let's call it conditionally-more frivolous cases did not cling at all to the prosecutor's regime of which i spoke.